↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Protein Intake on Strength, Body Composition and Endocrine Changes in Strength/Power Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
25 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Protein Intake on Strength, Body Composition and Endocrine Changes in Strength/Power Athletes
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-3-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay R. Hoffman, Nicholas A. Ratamess, Jie Kang, Michael J. Falvo, Avery D. Faigenbaum

Abstract

Comparison of protein intakes on strength, body composition and hormonal changes were examined in 23 experienced collegiate strength/power athletes participating in a 12-week resistance training program. Subjects were stratified into three groups depending upon their daily consumption of protein; below recommended levels (BL; 1.0 - 1.4 g.kg-1.day-1; n = 8), recommended levels (RL; 1.6 - 1.8 g.kg-1.day-1; n = 7) and above recommended levels (AL; > 2.0 g.kg-1.day-1; n = 8). Subjects were assessed for strength [one-repetition maximum (1-RM) bench press and squat] and body composition. Resting blood samples were analyzed for total testosterone, cortisol, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor. No differences were seen in energy intake (3,171 +/- 577 kcal) between the groups, and the energy intake for all groups were also below the recommended levels for strength/power athletes. No significant changes were seen in body mass, lean body mass or fat mass in any group. Significant improvements in 1-RM bench press and 1-RM squat were seen in all three groups, however no differences between the groups were observed. Subjects in AL experienced a 22% and 42% greater change in Delta 1-RM squat and Delta 1-RM bench press than subjects in RL, however these differences were not significant. No significant changes were seen in any of the resting hormonal concentrations. The results of this study do not provide support for protein intakes greater than recommended levels in collegiate strength/power athletes for body composition improvements, or alterations in resting hormonal concentrations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 198 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 20%
Student > Master 39 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 58 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#740,332
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#201
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,613
of 446,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#190
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.