↓ Skip to main content

Polarisation independent silicon-on-insulator slot waveguides

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polarisation independent silicon-on-insulator slot waveguides
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep37760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerian Hongjie Chen, Jun Rong Ong, Ching Eng Png

Abstract

The minimisation of birefringence, or polarisation mode dispersion, is vital for simplifying and miniaturising photonic components. In this work, we present a systematic study of the slot waveguide geometries required for having zero birefringence (ZB). We show that the rail widths required for ZB are more strongly dependent on the height of the waveguide than on the slot separation. After which, we demonstrate that the ZB geometry is significantly affected by the slanting of the waveguide walls. This paper proceeds to show that within the range studied, one can fix the height, slot, slant angle, and bend radius, and still achieve ZB by varying the widths of both of the rails. Given a fabrication tolerance of 5 nm, we show that a coherence length on the order of a hundred microns can be achieved. We finish by showing that for straight and bent ZB waveguides, having symmetric rails is preferable due to higher tolerances and lower sensitivity to bending. Since any arbitrarily shaped slot waveguide is a combination of both single mode straight and bent waveguides, we have a toolbox from which we can achieve ZB for any given slot and height.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 36%
Engineering 9 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,389,418
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#13,422
of 124,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,346
of 417,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#402
of 3,371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.