↓ Skip to main content

miRNomics: MicroRNA Biology and Computational Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'miRNomics: MicroRNA Biology and Computational Analysis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to MicroRNAs in Biological Systems
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Role of MicroRNAs in Biological Processes
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Role of MicroRNAs in Human Diseases
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Introduction to bioinformatics.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 MicroRNA and Noncoding RNA-Related Data Sources
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 High-Throughput Approaches for MicroRNA Expression Analysis.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Introduction to Machine Learning
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Introduction to Statistical Methods for MicroRNA Analysis.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Computational and Bioinformatics Methods for MicroRNA Gene Prediction
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Machine Learning Methods for MicroRNA Gene Prediction
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Functional, Structural, and Sequence Studies of MicroRNA
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Computational Methods for MicroRNA Target Prediction
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 MicroRNA Target and Gene Validation in Viruses and Bacteria
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Gene Reporter Assay to Validate MicroRNA Targets in Drosophila S2 Cells.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Computational Prediction of MicroRNA Function and Activity
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of MicroRNA Expression Using Machine Learning.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 MicroRNA Expression Landscapes in Stem Cells, Tissues, and Cancer
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Master Regulators of Posttranscriptional Gene Expression Are Subject to Regulation
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Use of MicroRNAs in Personalized Medicine
Attention for Chapter 16: Analysis of MicroRNA Expression Using Machine Learning.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of MicroRNA Expression Using Machine Learning.
Chapter number 16
Book title
miRNomics: MicroRNA Biology and Computational Analysis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-747-1, 978-1-62703-748-8
Authors

Wirth H, Cakir MV, Hopp L, Binder H, Henry Wirth, Mehmet Volkan Çakir, Lydia Hopp, Hans Binder, Wirth, Henry, Çakir, Mehmet Volkan, Hopp, Lydia, Binder, Hans

Abstract

The systematic analysis of miRNA expression and its potential mRNA targets constitutes a basal objective in miRNA research in addition to miRNA gene detection and miRNA target prediction. In this chapter we address methodical issues of miRNA expression analysis using self-organizing maps (SOM), a neural network machine learning algorithm with strong visualization and second-level analysis capabilities widely used to categorize large-scale, high-dimensional data. We shortly review selected experimental and theoretical aspects of miRNA expression analysis. Then, the protocol of our SOM method is outlined with special emphasis on miRNA/mRNA coexpression. The method allows extracting differentially expressed RNA transcripts, their functional context, and also characterization of global properties of expression states and profiles. In addition to the separate study of miRNA and mRNA expression landscapes, we propose the combined analysis of both entities using a covariance SOM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 29%
Computer Science 8 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,058,067
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,394
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,037
of 306,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#138
of 577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.