You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arsenal of plant cell wall degrading enzymes reflects host preference among plant pathogenic fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-4-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian C King, Katrina D Waxman, Nicholas V Nenni, Larry P Walker, Gary C Bergstrom, Donna M Gibson |
| Abstract |
The discovery and development of novel plant cell wall degrading enzymes is a key step towards more efficient depolymerization of polysaccharides to fermentable sugars for the production of liquid transportation biofuels and other bioproducts. The industrial fungus Trichoderma reesei is known to be highly cellulolytic and is a major industrial microbial source for commercial cellulases, xylanases and other cell wall degrading enzymes. However, enzyme-prospecting research continues to identify opportunities to enhance the activity of T. reesei enzyme preparations by supplementing with enzymatic diversity from other microbes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the enzymatic potential of a broad range of plant pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi for their ability to degrade plant biomass and isolated polysaccharides. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 27% |
| Researcher | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 169 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,361,146
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#164
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,806
of 123,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them