You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved self-efficacy in persons with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis after an intensive social cognitive wellness program with participation of support partners: a 6-months observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Joseph Jongen, Rob Ruimschotel, Marco Heerings, Astrid Hussaarts, Lotte Duyverman, Anneke van der Zande, Joyce Valkenburg-Vissers, Hanne Wolper, Maarten van Droffelaar, Wim Lemmens, Rogier Donders, Leo H Visser |
| Abstract |
For persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) it is important to preserve their autonomy, in spite of increasing disability. A major factor mediating autonomy is self-efficacy. According to the social cognitive theory stressors are crucial determinants of self-efficacy, as well as the interaction with partners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,820
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,681
of 236,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.