You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dental calculus is not equivalent to bone collagen for isotope analysis: a comparison between carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis of bulk dental calculus, bone and dentine collagen from same individuals from the Medieval site of El Raval (Alicante, Spain)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.026 |
| Authors |
D.C. Salazar-García, M.P. Richards, O. Nehlich, A.G. Henry |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 21 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2,253
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,288
of 227,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#50
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.