↓ Skip to main content

Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-r73
Pubmed ID
Authors

C André Lévesque, Henk Brouwer, Liliana Cano, John P Hamilton, Carson Holt, Edgar Huitema, Sylvain Raffaele, Gregg P Robideau, Marco Thines, Joe Win, Marcelo M Zerillo, Gordon W Beakes, Jeffrey L Boore, Dana Busam, Bernard Dumas, Steve Ferriera, Susan I Fuerstenberg, Claire MM Gachon, Elodie Gaulin, Francine Govers, Laura Grenville-Briggs, Neil Horner, Jessica Hostetler, Rays HY Jiang, Justin Johnson, Theerapong Krajaejun, Haining Lin, Harold JG Meijer, Barry Moore, Paul Morris, Vipaporn Phuntmart, Daniela Puiu, Jyoti Shetty, Jason E Stajich, Sucheta Tripathy, Stephan Wawra, Pieter van West, Brett R Whitty, Pedro M Coutinho, Bernard Henrissat, Frank Martin, Paul D Thomas, Brett M Tyler, Ronald P De Vries, Sophien Kamoun, Mark Yandell, Ned Tisserat, C Robin Buell

Abstract

Pythium ultimum is a ubiquitous oomycete plant pathogen responsible for a variety of diseases on a broad range of crop and ornamental species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 369 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Researcher 86 22%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 61 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 258 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 10%
Computer Science 5 1%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 69 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,070,820
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,289
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,858
of 104,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.