You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple methods for multiple futures: Integrating qualitative scenario planning and quantitative simulation modeling for natural resource decision making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Risk Management, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.crm.2017.07.002 |
| Authors |
Amy J. Symstad, Nicholas A. Fisichelli, Brian W. Miller, Erika Rowland, Gregor W. Schuurman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#12,988,607
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Climate Risk Management
#352
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,085
of 421,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Risk Management
#30
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.