↓ Skip to main content

Multiple methods for multiple futures: Integrating qualitative scenario planning and quantitative simulation modeling for natural resource decision making

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Risk Management, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple methods for multiple futures: Integrating qualitative scenario planning and quantitative simulation modeling for natural resource decision making
Published in
Climate Risk Management, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.07.002
Authors

Amy J. Symstad, Nicholas A. Fisichelli, Brian W. Miller, Erika Rowland, Gregor W. Schuurman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Engineering 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,988,961
of 13,584,688 outputs
Outputs from Climate Risk Management
#107
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,762
of 267,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Risk Management
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,584,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.