↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 Vpr expression and innate immunity influence neurovirulence

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 Vpr expression and innate immunity influence neurovirulence
Published in
Retrovirology, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-8-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Na, Shaona Acharjee, Gareth Jones, Pornpun Vivithanaporn, Farshid Noorbakhsh, Nicola McFarlane, Ferdinand Maingat, Klaus Ballanyi, Carlos A Pardo, Éric A Cohen, Christopher Power

Abstract

Viral diversity and abundance are defining properties of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1's biology and pathogenicity. Despite the increasing availability of antiretroviral therapy, HIV-associated dementia (HAD) continues to be a devastating consequence of HIV-1 infection of the brain although the underlying disease mechanisms remain uncertain. Herein, molecular diversity within the HIV-1 non-structural gene, Vpr, was examined in RNA sequences derived from brain and blood of HIV/AIDS patients with or without HIV-associated dementia (HAD) together with the ensuing pathobiological effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,743,003
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#161
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,896
of 123,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.