↓ Skip to main content

The change and the mediating role of parental emotional reactions and depression in the treatment of traumatized youth: results from a randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 399)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The change and the mediating role of parental emotional reactions and depression in the treatment of traumatized youth: results from a randomized controlled study
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-8-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonje Holt, Tine K Jensen, Tore Wentzel-Larsen

Abstract

Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) has been shown to efficiently treat children and youth exposed to traumatizing events. However, few studies have looked into mechanisms that may distinguish this treatment from other treatments. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the parents' emotional reactions and depressive symptoms change over the course of therapy in the treatment conditions of TF-CBT and Therapy as Usual (TAU), and whether changes in the reactions mediate the difference between the treatment conditions on child post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms and child depressive symptoms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 25%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 58%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Unspecified 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#896,589
of 11,874,340 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#33
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,897
of 188,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,874,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.