↓ Skip to main content

Designing privacy-friendly digital whiteboards for mediation of clinical progress

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Designing privacy-friendly digital whiteboards for mediation of clinical progress
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-14-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erlend Andreas Gjære, Børge Lillebo

Abstract

In hospitals, digital versions of dry-erase whiteboards are increasingly becoming more common. One of the purposes with such whiteboards is to support coordination of care by augmenting visibility and availability of clinical information. However, clinical information usually concerns patients and is regarded as sensitive personal health information, meaning that it should be access controlled. The purpose of this study is to explore how digital whiteboards can be designed for supporting coordination of care, by providing clinicians with useful information in a usable way, and at the same time protect patient privacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Computer Science 9 20%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,475,243
of 17,986,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#586
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,303
of 199,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,986,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them