You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nursing churn and turnover in Australian hospitals: nurses perceptions and suggestions for supportive strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela J Dawson, Helen Stasa, Michael A Roche, Caroline S E Homer, Christine Duffield |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to reveal nurses' experiences and perceptions of turnover in Australian hospitals and identify strategies to improve retention, performance and job satisfaction. Nursing turnover is a serious issue that can compromise patient safety, increase health care costs and impact on staff morale. A qualitative design was used to analyze responses from 362 nurses collected from a national survey of nurses from medical and surgical nursing units across 3 Australian States/Territories. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 343 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 127 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,295,742
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#369
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,320
of 232,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.