↓ Skip to main content

Goal-directed fluid optimization based on stroke volume variation and cardiac index during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopy lobectomy operations: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Goal-directed fluid optimization based on stroke volume variation and cardiac index during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopy lobectomy operations: a pilot study
Published in
Clinics, July 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)27
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Zhang, CQ Chen, XZ Lei, ZY Feng, SM Zhu

Abstract

This pilot study was designed to utilize stroke volume variation and cardiac index to ensure fluid optimization during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomies.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 21 26%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,052,635
of 18,679,853 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#158
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,205
of 201,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,679,853 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.