You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The consumption of unhealthy foods by Brazilian children is influenced by their mother’s educational level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Regina Dias Medici Saldiva, Sonia Isoyama Venancio, Andréia Cardoso de Santana, Ana Lucia da Silva Castro, Maria Mercedes Loureiro Escuder, Elsa Regina Justo Giugliani |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the association between the consumption of unhealthy foods in children under one year and the education level of the mothers, data obtained from participants of the II Survey on the prevalence of breastfeeding in the Brazilian capitals and the Federal District in 2008 was analyzed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,956,832
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#692
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,781
of 225,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.