↓ Skip to main content

Health workers’ perceptions of facilitators of and barriers to institutional delivery in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health workers’ perceptions of facilitators of and barriers to institutional delivery in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tesfay Gebrehiwot, Miguel San Sebastian, Kerstin Edin, Isabel Goicolea

Abstract

Evidence shows that the three delays, delay in 1) deciding to seek medical care, 2) reaching health facilities and 3) receiving adequate obstetric care, are still contributing to maternal deaths in low-income countries. Ethiopia is a major contributor to the worldwide death toll of mothers with a maternal mortality ratio of 676 per 100,000 live births. The Ethiopian Ministry of Health launched a community-based health-care system in 2003, the Health Extension Programme (HEP), to tackle maternal mortality. Despite strong efforts, universal access to services remains limited, particularly skilled delivery attendance. With the help of 'the three delays' framework, this study explores health-service providers' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the utilization of institutional delivery in Tigray, a northern region of Ethiopia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 268 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 56 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 19%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 66 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,517
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,061
of 4,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,812
of 242,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#47
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.