↓ Skip to main content

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter clinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter clinical study
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/ar4520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dandan Wang, Jing Li, Yu Zhang, Miaojia Zhang, Jinyun Chen, Xia Li, Xiang Hu, Shu Jiang, Songtao Shi, Lingyun Sun

Abstract

Umbilical cord (UC)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown a good safety profile and therapeutic effect in severe and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in our single-center pilot study. The present multicenter clinical trial was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of allogenic UC MSC transplantation (MSCT) in active and refractory SLE patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 16 8%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 58 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,835,584
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#283
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,056
of 237,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.