You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower- and middle-income countries: a qualitative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald C Cole, Alan Boyd, Garry Aslanyan, Imelda Bates |
| Abstract |
The monitoring and evaluation of health research capacity strengthening (health RCS) commonly involves documenting activities and outputs using indicators or metrics. We sought to catalogue the types of indicators being used to evaluate health RCS and to assess potential gaps in quality and coverage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,715,950
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#657
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,311
of 228,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.