↓ Skip to main content

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins

Abstract

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 22 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,698,580
of 21,749,011 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,374
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,002
of 206,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,749,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.