You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins |
| Abstract |
The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,156,935
of 24,406,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,929
of 12,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,087
of 229,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.