↓ Skip to main content

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins

Abstract

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,391,848
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,129
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,487
of 238,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.