↓ Skip to main content

Psychological impact of family history risk assessment in primary care: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Family Practice, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological impact of family history risk assessment in primary care: a mixed methods study
Published in
Family Practice, April 2014
DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmu012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Birt, Jon D Emery, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Fiona M Walter

Abstract

Routine family history risk assessment for chronic diseases could enable primary care practitioners to efficiently identify at-risk patients and promote preventive management strategies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Unspecified 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Psychology 12 20%
Unspecified 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,895,415
of 13,252,971 outputs
Outputs from Family Practice
#547
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,510
of 190,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Practice
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,252,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.