You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intervention to improve social and family support for caregivers of dependent patients: ICIAS study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Rosell-Murphy, Josep Mª Bonet-Simó, Esther Baena, Gemma Prieto, Eva Bellerino, Francesc Solé, Montserrat Rubio, Ilona Krier, Pascuala Torres, Sonia Mimoso, the ICIAS research group |
| Abstract |
Despite the existence of formal professional support services, informal support (mainly family members) continues to be the main source of eldercare, especially for those who are dependent or disabled. Professionals on the primary health care are the ideal choice to educate, provide psychological support, and help to mobilize social resources available to the informal caregiver.Controversy remains concerning the efficiency of multiple interventions, taking a holistic approach to both the patient and caregiver, and optimum utilization of the available community resources. .For this reason our goal is to assess whether an intervention designed to improve the social support for caregivers effectively decreases caregivers burden and improves their quality of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 280 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 92 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 16% |
| Psychology | 29 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 103 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,432
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,544
of 237,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.