↓ Skip to main content

What coatis and mongooses have in common?

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What coatis and mongooses have in common?
Published in
Biota Neotropica, September 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1676-06032010000300040
Authors

Ivan Sazima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 32 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,591,294
of 22,457,522 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#152
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,585
of 82,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,457,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.