You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using maize as a model to study pollen tube growth and guidance, cross-incompatibility and sperm delivery in grasses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcr017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Dresselhaus, Andreas Lausser, Mihaela L. Márton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 123 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,159,421
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#996
of 3,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,883
of 119,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.