↓ Skip to main content

Built environment and physical activity in New Zealand adolescents: a protocol for a cross-sectional study: Table 1

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Built environment and physical activity in New Zealand adolescents: a protocol for a cross-sectional study: Table 1
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica A Hinckson, Scott Duncan, Melody Oliver, Suzanne Mavoa, Ester Cerin, Hannah Badland, Tom Stewart, Vivienne Ivory, Julia McPhee, Grant Schofield

Abstract

Built-environment interventions have the potential to provide population-wide effects and the means for a sustained effect on behaviour change. Population-wide effects for adult physical activity have been shown with selected built environment attributes; however, the association between the built environment and adolescent health behaviours is less clear. This New Zealand study is part of an international project across 10 countries (International Physical Activity and the Environment Network-adolescents) that aims to characterise the links between built environment and adolescent health outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 23%
Student > Master 32 19%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 12%
Sports and Recreations 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 34 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,519,368
of 15,922,425 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,766
of 14,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,085
of 154,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#62
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.