You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Built environment and physical activity in New Zealand adolescents: a protocol for a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erica A Hinckson, Scott Duncan, Melody Oliver, Suzanne Mavoa, Ester Cerin, Hannah Badland, Tom Stewart, Vivienne Ivory, Julia McPhee, Grant Schofield |
| Abstract |
Built-environment interventions have the potential to provide population-wide effects and the means for a sustained effect on behaviour change. Population-wide effects for adult physical activity have been shown with selected built environment attributes; however, the association between the built environment and adolescent health behaviours is less clear. This New Zealand study is part of an international project across 10 countries (International Physical Activity and the Environment Network-adolescents) that aims to characterise the links between built environment and adolescent health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 42 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 8% |
| Design | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 71 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,183,570
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#7,637
of 25,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,350
of 239,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#89
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.