You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stable Cycling of SiO2 Nanotubes as High-Performance Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep04605 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zachary Favors, Wei Wang, Hamed Hosseini Bay, Aaron George, Mihrimah Ozkan, Cengiz S. Ozkan |
| Abstract |
Herein, SiO2 nanotubes have been fabricated via a facile two step hard-template growth method and evaluated as an anode for Li-ion batteries. SiO2 nanotubes exhibit a highly stable reversible capacity of 1266 mAhg(-1) after 100 cycles with negligible capacity fading. SiO2 NT anodes experience a capacity increase throughout the first 80 cycles through Si phase growth via SiO2 reduction. The hollow morphology of the SiO2 nanotubes accommodates the large volume expansion experienced by Si-based anodes during lithiation and promotes preservation of the solid electrolyte interphase layer. The thin walls of the SiO2 nanotubes allow for effective reduction in Li-ion diffusion path distance and, thus, afford a favorable rate cyclability. The high aspect ratio character of these nanotubes allow for a relatively scalable fabrication method of nanoscale SiO2-based anodes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 51 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 18% |
| Engineering | 26 | 14% |
| Energy | 7 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2022.
All research outputs
#299,970
of 24,384,616 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,394
of 132,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,557
of 231,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#13
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.