↓ Skip to main content

The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli
Published in
Cognition, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana P. Gantman, Jay J. Van Bavel

Abstract

People perceive religious and moral iconography in ambiguous objects, ranging from grilled cheese to bird feces. In the current research, we examined whether moral concerns can shape awareness of perceptually ambiguous stimuli. In three experiments, we presented masked moral and non-moral words around the threshold for conscious awareness as part of a lexical decision task. Participants correctly identified moral words more frequently than non-moral words-a phenomenon we term the moral pop-out effect. The moral pop-out effect was only evident when stimuli were presented at durations that made them perceptually ambiguous, but not when the stimuli were presented too quickly to perceive or slowly enough to easily perceive. The moral pop-out effect was not moderated by exposure to harm and cannot be explained by differences in arousal, valence, or extremity. Although most models of moral psychology assume the initial perception of moral stimuli, our research suggests that moral beliefs and values may shape perceptual awareness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 140 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 32%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 58%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,025,257
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#308
of 3,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,297
of 224,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.