↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005200.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Vennix, Loeki Pelzers, Nicole Bouvy, Geerard L. Beets, Jean-Pierre Pierie, Theo Wiggers, Stephanie Breukink

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 221 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Unspecified 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Other 78 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 63%
Unspecified 45 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 15 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,157,595
of 13,384,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,952
of 10,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,043
of 189,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,384,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.