↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005200.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Vennix, Loeki Pelzers, Nicole Bouvy, Geerard L. Beets, Jean-Pierre Pierie, Theo Wiggers, Stephanie Breukink

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 61 26%
Unknown 34 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 51 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,700,062
of 15,847,519 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,428
of 11,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,642
of 193,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,847,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.