You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bolaji E Egbewale, Martyn Lewis, Julius Sim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 25% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 15% |
| Psychology | 24 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 13 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 26% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,134,164
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,443
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,352
of 242,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.