↓ Skip to main content

Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: A cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: A cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund F Chaney, Lisa V Rubenstein, Chuan-Fen Liu, Elizabeth M Yano, Cory Bolkan, Martin Lee, Barbara Simon, Andy Lanto, Bradford Felker, Jane Uman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Professor 11 6%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 29%
Psychology 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,885,652
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,624
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,919
of 141,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.