You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation of Neutral Mononuclear Copper Complexes Stabilized by Two Cyclic (Alkyl)(amino)carbenes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1021/ja502521b |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David S. Weinberger, Nurul Amin SK, Kartik Chandra Mondal, Mohand Melaimi, Guy Bertrand, A. Claudia Stückl, Herbert W. Roesky, Birger Dittrich, Serhiy Demeshko, Brigitte Schwederski, Wolfgang Kaim, Paul Jerabek, Gernot Frenking |
| Abstract |
Two (cAAC)2Cu complexes, featuring a two-coordinate copper atom in the formal oxidation state zero, were prepared by reducing (Et2-cAAC)2Cu(+)I(-) with metallic sodium in THF, and by a one-pot synthesis using Me2-cAAC, Cu(II)Cl2, and KC8 in toluene in a molar ratio of 2:1:2, respectively. Both complexes are highly air and moisture sensitive but can be stored in the solid state for a month at room temperature. DFT calculations showed that in these complexes the copper center has a d(10) electronic configuration and the unpaired electron is delocalized over two carbene carbon atoms. This was further confirmed by the EPR spectra, which exhibit multiple hyperfine lines due to the coupling of the unpaired electron with (63,65)Cu isotopes, (14)N, and (1)H nuclei. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 29% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 62 | 78% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,407,734
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#52,912
of 61,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,127
of 226,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#309
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.