↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of record keeping for cesarean deliveries: results from a multicenter retrospective record review in five low-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the quality of record keeping for cesarean deliveries: results from a multicenter retrospective record review in five low-income countries
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelyn Landry, Celia Pett, Renee Fiorentino, Joseph Ruminjo, Cristina Mattison

Abstract

Reliable, timely information is the foundation of decision making for functioning health systems; the quality of decision making rests on quality data. Routine monitoring, reporting, and review of cesarean section (CS) indications, decision-to-delivery intervals, and partograph use are important elements of quality improvement for maternity services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mali 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 27%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 43%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,973,273
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,635
of 4,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,064
of 226,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#38
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.