↓ Skip to main content

Can managers compensate for coyote predation of white‐tailed deer?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,241)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can managers compensate for coyote predation of white‐tailed deer?
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.693
Authors

Kelly F. Robinson, Duane R. Diefenbach, Angela K. Fuller, Jeremy E. Hurst, Christopher S. Rosenberry, Robinson, Kelly F., Diefenbach, Duane R., Fuller, Angela K., Hurst, Jeremy E., Rosenberry, Christopher S.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 65%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Unspecified 4 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#229,021
of 11,692,734 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#27
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,723
of 188,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,692,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.