| Title |
Emergence of Zaire Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1404505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sylvain Baize, Delphine Pannetier, Lisa Oestereich, Toni Rieger, Lamine Koivogui, N'Faly Magassouba, Barrè Soropogui, Mamadou Saliou Sow, Sakoba Keïta, Hilde De Clerck, Amanda Tiffany, Gemma Dominguez, Mathieu Loua, Alexis Traoré, Moussa Kolié, Emmanuel Roland Malano, Emmanuel Heleze, Anne Bocquin, Stephane Mély, Hervé Raoul, Valérie Caro, Dániel Cadar, Martin Gabriel, Meike Pahlmann, Dennis Tappe, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, Benido Impouma, Abdoul Karim Diallo, Pierre Formenty, Michel Van Herp, Stephan Günther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 299 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 15% |
| Spain | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Kenya | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 146 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 227 | 76% |
| Scientists | 27 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1393 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 261 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 236 | 16% |
| Researcher | 231 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 185 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 90 | 6% |
| Other | 275 | 19% |
| Unknown | 208 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 379 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 311 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 111 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 82 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 69 | 5% |
| Other | 275 | 19% |
| Unknown | 259 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#9,979
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#481
of 32,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 225,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.