You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-62 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Shekelle, Steven Woolf, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Holger J Schünemann, Martin P Eccles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 26% |
| Unknown | 44 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,415,998
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#550
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,130
of 164,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.