You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin P Eccles, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Paul Shekelle, Holger J Schünemann, Steven Woolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,805,485
of 24,374,350 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#357
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,819
of 167,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,374,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.