↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Predisposition to In Situ and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Predisposition to In Situ and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast
Published in
PLoS Genetics, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elinor Sawyer, Rebecca Roylance, Christos Petridis, Mark N. Brook, Salpie Nowinski, Efterpi Papouli, Olivia Fletcher, Sarah Pinder, Andrew Hanby, Kelly Kohut, Patricia Gorman, Michele Caneppele, Julian Peto, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Nichola Johnson, Ruth Swann, Miriam Dwek, Katherine-Anne Perkins, Cheryl Gillett, Richard Houlston, Gillian Ross, Paolo De Ieso, Melissa C. Southey, John L. Hopper, Elena Provenzano, Carmel Apicella, Jelle Wesseling, Sten Cornelissen, Renske Keeman, Peter A. Fasching, Sebastian M. Jud, Arif B. Ekici, Matthias W. Beckmann, Michael J. Kerin, Federick Marme, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Barbara Burwinkel, Pascal Guénel, Therese Truong, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Pierre Kerbrat, Stig E. Bojesen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Roger L. Milne, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, Primitiva Menéndez, Javier Benitez, Hermann Brenner, Aida Karina Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Alfons Meindl, Peter Lichtner, Rita K. Schmutzler, Magdalena Lochmann, Hiltrud Brauch, Hans-Peter Fischer, Yon-Dschun Ko, Heli Nevanlinna, Taru A. Muranen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Thilo Dörk, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, kConFab Investigators, Diether Lambrechts, Caroline Weltens, Erik Van Limbergen, Sigrid Hatse, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, Sara Volorio, Graham G. Giles, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto, Catriona A. Mclean, Christopher A. Haiman, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, France Labrèche, Martine Dumont, Vessela Kristensen, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Saila Kauppila, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Peter Devillee, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Caroline M. Seynaeve, Mieke Kriege, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Mark E. Sherman, Maartje J. Hooning, Antoinette Hollestelle, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Jingmei Li, Kamila Czene, Keith Humphreys, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Malcolm W. R. Reed, Mitul Shah, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna Durda, Anthony Swerdlow, Alan Ashworth, Nicholas Orr, Minouk Schoemaker, Fergus J. Couch, Emily Hallberg, Anna González-Neira, Guillermo Pita, M. Rosario Alonso, Daniel C. Tessier, Daniel Vincent, Francois Bacot, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Alison M. Dunning, Per Hall, Doug Easton, Paul Pharoah, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Ian Tomlinson, Montserrat Garcia-Closas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,965,827
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,555
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,112
of 240,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#40
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.