↓ Skip to main content

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in addiction treatment settings: design and intervention protocol of a group randomized pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in addiction treatment settings: design and intervention protocol of a group randomized pilot study
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1940-0640-9-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah B Hunter, Allison J Ober, Susan M Paddock, Priscillia E Hunt, Deborah Levan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Psychology 8 13%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#10,435,380
of 13,664,438 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#223
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,993
of 265,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,664,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.