↓ Skip to main content

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in addiction treatment settings: design and intervention protocol of a group randomized pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in addiction treatment settings: design and intervention protocol of a group randomized pilot study
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1940-0640-9-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah B Hunter, Allison J Ober, Susan M Paddock, Priscillia E Hunt, Deborah Levan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Psychology 8 13%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#416
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,505
of 322,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.