↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Françoise Vendittelli, Marie-Caroline Tassié, Laurent Gerbaud, Didier Lémery

Abstract

The overall caesarean rate in France has increased from 14.3% in 1994-1996 to 21.0% in 2010. This increased rate is a concern in all developed countries: delivery by caesarean induces both short- and long-term maternal complications, and its use requires careful reflection. The principal objective of this work was to describe the global appropriateness of indications for caesareans among a selected sample of planned caesareans performed within the Auvergne perinatal health network. The secondary objectives were to describe the inappropriate planned caesarean risk according to the maternity unit level and the impact of this medical assessment on the global caesarean rate in this network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Peru 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,983
of 4,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,664
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#70
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.