↓ Skip to main content

Large gene overlaps in prokaryotic genomes: result of functional constraints or mispredictions?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large gene overlaps in prokaryotic genomes: result of functional constraints or mispredictions?
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert Pallejà, Eoghan D Harrington, Peer Bork

Abstract

Across the fully sequenced microbial genomes there are thousands of examples of overlapping genes. Many of these are only a few nucleotides long and are thought to function by permitting the coordinated regulation of gene expression. However, there should also be selective pressure against long overlaps, as the existence of overlapping reading frames increases the risk of deleterious mutations. Here we examine the longest overlaps and assess whether they are the product of special functional constraints or of erroneous annotation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 2 3%
India 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 66 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Computer Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,098,897
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#972
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,416
of 95,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.