↓ Skip to main content

Células-tronco hematopoéticas em cães

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Células-tronco hematopoéticas em cães
Published in
Ciência Rural, February 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0103-84782006000100054
Authors

Ana Paula Massae Nakage, Aureo Evangelista Santana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,471,794
of 4,655,094 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,601
of 109,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,655,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them