You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001920.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex Todhunter-Brown, Gillian Baer, Pauline Campbell, Pei Ling Choo, Anne Forster, Jacqui Morris, Valerie M Pomeroy, Peter Langhorne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
Chile | 3 | 8% |
Japan | 2 | 5% |
France | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Singapore | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 60% |
Scientists | 11 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | <1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 1279 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 233 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 178 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 9% |
Researcher | 102 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 81 | 6% |
Other | 230 | 18% |
Unknown | 359 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 319 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 246 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 89 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 3% |
Engineering | 39 | 3% |
Other | 167 | 13% |
Unknown | 400 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#772,047
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,446
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,065
of 241,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.