↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
68 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Wolfe, Carleen Zebuhr, Alexis A. Topjian, Akira Nishisaki, Dana E. Niles, Peter A. Meaney, Lori Boyle, Rita T. Giordano, Daniela Davis, Margaret Priestley, Michael Apkon, Robert A. Berg, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Robert M. Sutton

Abstract

In-hospital cardiac arrest is an important public health problem. High-quality resuscitation improves survival but is difficult to achieve. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, interdisciplinary, postevent quantitative debriefing program to improve survival outcomes after in-hospital pediatric chest compression events.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 22 16%
Other 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 24 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#334,117
of 15,926,394 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#168
of 7,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,409
of 192,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#3
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,926,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.