↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Wolfe, Carleen Zebuhr, Alexis A. Topjian, Akira Nishisaki, Dana E. Niles, Peter A. Meaney, Lori Boyle, Rita T. Giordano, Daniela Davis, Margaret Priestley, Michael Apkon, Robert A. Berg, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Robert M. Sutton

Abstract

In-hospital cardiac arrest is an important public health problem. High-quality resuscitation improves survival but is difficult to achieve. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, interdisciplinary, postevent quantitative debriefing program to improve survival outcomes after in-hospital pediatric chest compression events.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Other 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 34 30%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Psychology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 12 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#271,737
of 13,973,339 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#125
of 7,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,225
of 189,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#1
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,973,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.