| Title |
Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000327 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather Wolfe, Carleen Zebuhr, Alexis A. Topjian, Akira Nishisaki, Dana E. Niles, Peter A. Meaney, Lori Boyle, Rita T. Giordano, Daniela Davis, Margaret Priestley, Michael Apkon, Robert A. Berg, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Robert M. Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 31% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 25% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#662,075
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#269
of 9,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,010
of 245,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#4
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.