The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002782 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valeria CC Marinho, Julian PT Higgins, Stuart Logan, Aubrey Sheiham |
Abstract |
Topical fluoride therapy (TFT) in the form of varnish, gel, mouthrinse or toothpaste has been used extensively as a caries-preventive intervention for over three decades. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
Ireland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 468 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 75 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 57 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 6% |
Researcher | 27 | 6% |
Other | 82 | 17% |
Unknown | 168 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 216 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
Chemistry | 6 | 1% |
Other | 45 | 9% |
Unknown | 181 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2015.
All research outputs
#5,627,011
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,742
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,398
of 56,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.