↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Mechanism of Action for Anti-Thymocyte Globulin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Mechanism of Action for Anti-Thymocyte Globulin
Published in
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, October 2006
DOI 10.1681/asn.2006050422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Lopez, Michael R. Clarkson, Monica Albin, Mohamed H. Sayegh, Nader Najafian

Abstract

T cell-depleting agents are being tested as part of clinical tolerance strategies in humans with autoimmunity and transplantation. The immunosuppressive activity of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been thought to result primarily from depletion of peripheral lymphocytes. Herein is reported for the first time that ATG but not anti-CD52 mAb (alemtuzumab) or the IL-2R antagonists causes rapid and sustained expansion of CD4+CD25+ T cells when cultured with human peripheral blood lymphocytes. These cells display enhanced expression of the regulatory markers glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and forkhead box P3 and efficiently suppress a direct alloimmune response of the original responder lymphocytes. It is interesting that the cells do not suppress memory responses to the recall antigen mumps. Ex vivo expansion of regulatory T cells is due mainly to conversion of CD4+CD25- into CD4+CD25+ T cells and to a lesser degree to proliferation of natural CD4+CD25+ T cells. The induction of regulatory T cells depends on production of Th2 cytokines in the generating cultures. These novel data suggest that ATG not only may promote expansion/generation of regulatory T cells but also may be useful in future ex vivo expansion of these cells for cellular therapy in autoimmunity and clinical transplantation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2007.
All research outputs
#15,826,468
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#4,717
of 5,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,979
of 68,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#42
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.