↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
423 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, May 2012
DOI 10.2471/blt.11.099424
Pubmed ID
22589569
Authors

Frances S Mair, Carl May, Catherine O’Donnell, Tracy Finch, Frank Sullivan, Elizabeth Murray

Abstract

To systematically review the literature on the implementation of e-health to identify: (i) barriers and facilitators to e-health implementation, and (ii) outstanding gaps in research on the subject.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 419 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 6%
Researcher 16 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Student > Bachelor 15 4%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 257 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 7%
Computer Science 20 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 265 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,053,895
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1,197
of 4,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,128
of 165,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.