↓ Skip to main content

Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006274.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip Good, Russell Richard, William Syrmis, Sue Jenkins-Marsh, Jane Stephens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 17 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Unspecified 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#564,622
of 12,976,034 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,872
of 10,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,957
of 189,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,976,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.