↓ Skip to main content

Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006274.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip Good, Russell Richard, William Syrmis, Sue Jenkins-Marsh, Jane Stephens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 24 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#713,707
of 14,608,258 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,117
of 11,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,762
of 188,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,608,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.