↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Research highlights Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-12-122
Pubmed ID
24767102
Authors

Guixiang Liao, Zhihong Zhao, Shuhui Lin, Rong Li, Yawei Yuan, Shasha Du, Jiarong Chen, Haijun Deng

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is popularly performed for colorectal disease. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RCS) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) for colorectal disease based on randomized controlled trial studies.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 47%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#11,447,800
of 18,796,975 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#346
of 1,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,660
of 200,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,796,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.