↓ Skip to main content

Developing global climate anomalies suggest potential disease risks for 2006 – 2007

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing global climate anomalies suggest potential disease risks for 2006 – 2007
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-5-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Assaf Anyamba, Jean-Paul Chretien, Jennifer Small, Compton J Tucker, Kenneth J Linthicum

Abstract

El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) related climate anomalies have been shown to have an impact on infectious disease outbreaks. The Climate Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA/CPC) has recently issued an unscheduled El Niño advisory, indicating that warmer than normal sea surface temperatures across the equatorial eastern Pacific may have pronounced impacts on global tropical precipitation patterns extending into the northern hemisphere particularly over North America. Building evidence of the links between ENSO driven climate anomalies and infectious diseases, particularly those transmitted by insects, can allow us to provide improved long range forecasts of an epidemic or epizootic. We describe developing climate anomalies that suggest potential disease risks using satellite generated data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 271 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 25%
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Other 17 6%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 40 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 21%
Environmental Science 29 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 49 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,073,516
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#136
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,220
of 156,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.