↓ Skip to main content

Flows for native fish in the Murray-Darling Basin: lessons and considerations for future management

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Management & Restoration, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flows for native fish in the Murray-Darling Basin: lessons and considerations for future management
Published in
Ecological Management & Restoration, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/emr.12091
Authors

John D. Koehn, Alison J. King, Leah Beesley, Craig Copeland, Brenton P. Zampatti, Martin Mallen-Cooper

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 30%
Engineering 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,982,283
of 13,384,384 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#97
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,890
of 188,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,384,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.