You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seventy‐One Important Questions for the Conservation of Marine Biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. C. M. PARSONS, BRETT FAVARO, A. ALONSO AGUIRRE, AMY L. BAUER, LOUISE K. BLIGHT, JOHN A. CIGLIANO, MELINDA A. COLEMAN, ISABELLE M. CÔTÉ, MEGAN DRAHEIM, STEPHEN FLETCHER, MELISSA M. FOLEY, REBECCA JEFFERSON, MIRANDA C. JONES, BRENDAN P. KELAHER, CAROLYN J. LUNDQUIST, JULIE‐BETH MCCARTHY, ANNE NELSON, KATHERYN PATTERSON, LESLIE WALSH, ANDREW J. WRIGHT, WILLIAM J. SUTHERLAND |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 304 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 14% |
| Australia | 14 | 5% |
| Canada | 11 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Comoros | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 129 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 224 | 74% |
| Scientists | 63 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 17% |
| Unknown | 100 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 181 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 123 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Unknown | 116 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 302. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#118,023
of 25,935,829 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#27
of 4,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#914
of 243,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,935,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.