↓ Skip to main content

Detoxification of sulphidic African shelf waters by blooming chemolithotrophs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detoxification of sulphidic African shelf waters by blooming chemolithotrophs
Published in
Nature, December 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature07588
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaute Lavik, Torben Stührmann, Volker Brüchert, Anja Van der Plas, Volker Mohrholz, Phyllis Lam, Marc Mußmann, Bernhard M. Fuchs, Rudolf Amann, Ulrich Lass, Marcel M. M. Kuypers

Abstract

Coastal waters support approximately 90 per cent of global fisheries and are therefore an important food reserve for our planet. Eutrophication of these waters, due to human activity, leads to severe oxygen depletion and the episodic occurrence of hydrogen sulphide-toxic to multi-cellular life-with disastrous consequences for coastal ecosytems. Here we show that an area of approximately 7,000 km(2) of African shelf, covered by sulphidic water, was detoxified by blooming bacteria that oxidized the biologically harmful sulphide to environmentally harmless colloidal sulphur and sulphate. Combined chemical analyses, stoichiometric modelling, isotopic incubations, comparative 16S ribosomal RNA, functional gene sequence analyses and fluorescence in situ hybridization indicate that the detoxification proceeded by chemolithotrophic oxidation of sulphide with nitrate and was mainly catalysed by two discrete populations of gamma- and epsilon-proteobacteria. Chemolithotrophic bacteria, accounting for approximately 20 per cent of the bacterioplankton in sulphidic waters, created a buffer zone between the toxic sulphidic subsurface waters and the oxic surface waters, where fish and other nekton live. This is the first time that large-scale detoxification of sulphidic waters by chemolithotrophs has been observed in an open-ocean system. The data suggest that sulphide can be completely consumed by bacteria in the subsurface waters and, thus, can be overlooked by remote sensing or monitoring of shallow coastal waters. Consequently, sulphidic bottom waters on continental shelves may be more common than previously believed, and could therefore have an important but as yet neglected effect on benthic communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Chile 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Namibia 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 305 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 26%
Researcher 88 26%
Student > Master 34 10%
Professor 20 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 6%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 34%
Environmental Science 69 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 63 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 50 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#89,541
of 90,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,395
of 165,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#518
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.